2 m read

How is open source software security different from closed source software security?

Open source software security and closed-source software security differ primarily in access to source code, security through obscurity, community involvement, and speed of vulnerability remediation.

Open source code’s transparency allows for prompt identification and fixing of vulnerabilities. In closed source, only authorized personnel from the proprietary company can scrutinize the code, limiting accessibility for scrutiny.

What Does the Accessibility of Source Code Mean for Security?

For open-source software, the code is freely available for anyone to review. This transparency facilitates broader scrutiny, expediting the identification and resolution of security issues. In closed-source software, limited source access to the developing company’s team narrows the pathway for spotting and rectifying security setbacks.

Despite this, the ‘security through obscurity’ debate is pertinent in this context. Critics argue that having visible code in open-source models may give hackers an advantage. However, this argument has seen counter views as security through obscurity is no substitute for robust security procedures which are part of the Open Source Software Security philosophy.

How Does Community Involvement Influence Security?

Open-source software benefits from a global community of contributors with diverse skill sets 🌐👥, enabling swift detection and response to security issues. In contrast, closed-source software relies on an in-house team, potentially lacking the same diversity and numbers.

This community involvement in open source software doesn’t just help in identifying vulnerabilities faster but also aids in generating fixes and patches at a faster rate. Hence, the rate of resolving issues is generally quicker in open source than in closed source.

What is the Impact of Patch Speed on Security?

The speed of patching vulnerabilities is crucial in software security ⚡🛡️. Open source software, with its wide community of developers, tends to have a more rapid reaction to threats. Updates and patches are often deployed rapidly reducing the potential window of exposure.

Conversely, patching in closed source software can be slower as the process relies on a single entity. This means that vulnerabilities can remain exploitable for extended periods, causing substantial security risks.

How Does Vendor Dependence Shift Security Dynamics?

One of the key differences with closed source software is the total dependence on a single vendor for addressing security concerns. This can lead to delays and operational difficulties if the vendor fails or chooses not to fix certain problems.

On another hand, with open source software, if the original developers are slow to fix a problem or if the project gets abandoned, others in the community can step in to resolve issues. The continuity and dependability of open source offer a unique combination of flexibility and resilience.


In summary, the differences between open source and closed source software security revolve around critical areas of code accessibility, community involvement, speed of vulnerability remediation, and vendor dependence. These elements combined make open source security inherently different and in many respects more advantageous than closed source security.


Leave a Reply